Huxley & Kent Handed Three States to a Family-Owned Regional

Huxley & Kent picked IPS South, a family-owned regional covering California, Nevada, and Hawaii, and gave them exclusive rights to the brand's best-selling toys and accessories in those three states.

The decision and what it bought

IPS South is regional by design, family-owned, built on personalized service and direct retailer relationships, not catalog scale. The partnership gives IPS South exclusive distribution across three states, meaning if you're a store in that footprint and you want Huxley & Kent, you're calling IPS South.

Robin Kershner, Huxley & Kent's founder and CEO, said it plainly: "Finding the right distribution partner means more than expanding our reach. It means partnering with a company that shares our commitment to retailers." The company framed the choice around service quality and retailer relationships, not footprint.

Mike Rouhizad, IPS South's CEO, positioned the deal as assortment expansion for independents: "Giving independent retailers more choices is what truly matters. Every pet store serves a unique customer base, and having a broader assortment of high-quality products allows them to better meet those needs."

Who this squeezes and who it helps

If you're a store in California, Nevada, or Hawaii, you now have one call to make for Huxley & Kent reorders, and it's to a regional player whose entire business model is built on being more responsive than larger distributors.

If you're a distributor who was carrying Huxley & Kent in those states, the line just moved to someone else's catalog.

If you're IPS South, you just added a toy and accessory brand to your assortment, which makes the sales call to independents easier. You're offering a line with faster replenishment and tighter category support than a larger catalog might provide.

If you're an emerging brand trying to decide between distribution models, this is a template. Huxley & Kent chose regional, which means they valued something other than footprint. The something else is speed, focus, and the ability to move on terms without a committee.

If your week runs on calls like this one, subscribe to PetRetailNews.

Our read: the leverage is moving

The interesting part isn't that a brand picked a regional distributor. It's that they gave them exclusive territory. That signals intent.

Regionals compete on what they can deliver that larger players sometimes can't: faster local replenishment, tighter category advocacy, and decision-making that doesn't run through multiple approval layers. IPS South's pitch, based on Rouhizad's quote, was assortment depth and retailer choice. The subtext: we'll carry your line with focus.

For stores, this changes the primary vendor calculation. If brands start choosing regionals for certain territories, your local distributor may carry lines others don't, which means you're either splitting orders across more vendors or consolidating with the regional.

For brands, the playbook is now visible: regional partnerships let you prioritize service intensity over geographic coverage. You may get better shelf advocacy and faster supply chain response from a partner whose business depends on making your line work at store level. The trade is coverage, you need to decide whether focused distribution in select states serves you better than broader but thinner reach.

The shift isn't seismic yet, but it's directional. If more brands announce regional partnerships in the coming months, the competitive dynamic between distribution models just changed.

← Back to the Newsdesk